How Settlement Agreements Empower Survivors in Tennessee Civil Trials

In the court of public opinion, settlement agreements often bear the weight of misunderstanding and premature judgment. People often assume incorrectly that when a case concludes with a settlement, the survivor was “in it for the money,” or they may interpret the settlement as an indication that no wrongdoing actually occurred and that the other party just paid to end the case.

The truth is far more empowering: settlement agreements often offer survivors a higher level of autonomy and control that a civil trial jury verdict doesn’t match. Recognizing your options and feeling empowered to make these pivotal choices during your trial, before a verdict is reached, is essential. However, understanding the limitations of certain settlement agreement clauses is equally crucial to ensure you are making the most informed decision for your own story.

A Jury Verdict is Purely Monetary

A jury verdict in a Tennessee civil case means seeking and ultimately receiving monetary damages for the losses you’ve encountered. For some, this financial compensation signifies the end of a chapter, allowing them to move forward with the case in their rearview mirror.

However, for others, relinquishing the control, privacy, and intricacy offered by a settlement agreement is more appealing than being dragged through a long trial. Most Tennessee civil case verdicts and other elements of those cases are accessible to the public, but settlements are able to be sealed to retain privacy.

Common Clauses Found in Settlement Agreements

Settlement agreements are not limited to financial compensation; they offer the possibility of including additional terms that provide more control, privacy, and ultimately, closure. These terms include things like forcing an employer to implement policy improvements, ensuring the continuation of health insurance for an unjustly terminated employee, or mandating other specific non-monetary actions from the perpetrator to address moral damages. These provisions tailor the resolution to the survivor’s needs and circumstances, offering a more holistic approach to justice.

Furthermore, there are common legal clauses to address such as confidentiality agreements (often referred to as non-disclosure agreements or NDAs) and non-disparagement clauses are common practice. A confidentiality agreement can secure the privacy of the settlement details, allowing the survivor to regain control over their story. Non-disparagement clauses foster a respectful post-settlement environment, preventing further negative comments that could harm the reputation of either side.

These clauses protect the interests and future of all parties involved, facilitating a respectful transition into post-settlement life. However, they are nuanced and must be carefully crafted to balance protection with freedom of speech.

The Limitations of Settlement Clauses

While settlement clauses offer significant benefits, they are not without their limitations. Courts have sometimes challenged and invalidated these clauses, particularly when they overly restrict free speech or when their scope is too broad, making their enforceability questionable. The Anti-SLAPP Law in Tennessee is a prime example of legislation that prioritizes protecting free speech, often making confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses difficult or impossible to enforce in defamation cases.

This limitation underscores the importance of drafting settlement clauses with a more focused scope focused on the relevant elements of your case rather than a broader scope. A well-crafted clause can provide the intended protection without infringing on fundamental rights. Awareness of these limitations is crucial for survivors and their legal representatives, ensuring that settlement agreements truly serve the survivor’s best interests and legal rights, allowing for a resolution that respects both privacy and free expression.

Make Informed Choices a Part of Your Story

Many people want people in civil cases to make decisions on behalf of society as a whole, but the reality is you don’t owe society anything when seeking justice and healing for what you’ve been through. At Hunter Law Firm, we work closely with people who want to tell their stories and get the justice they deserve in a Tennessee civil law case. We frequently take on some of the most challenging cases in the state because we believe everyone deserves a chance to have their story heard and write their own ending. When you’re ready, we’re here to help you make informed choices during your civil trial that empower you to move forward with integrity and peace of mind.

The following two tabs change content below.

Hunter Employment Law

Latest posts by Hunter Employment Law (see all)